If you or your organization are using or are planning to use thin client technology to deploy back-office or plant floor applications, you will want to read this article.  For many years, Citrix and Windows Terminal Services have dominated the back-office market while ACP's ThinManager dominated the plant floor.  The most common reason for choosing ACP at the manufacturing level is the availability of industrialized hardware and ACP's ability to handle all of the plant floor device drivers that are needed to run a manufacturing operation.  Today, ThinManager is a very mature product that has evolved to outpace its competition in all areas of technology.

If you are looking to compare ThinManager to Citrix or Windows Terminal Services, we think you will be surprised to know that there really is no comparison.  ThinManager matches all of the functionality of Citrix and then adds several significant features that go above and beyond.  The matrix below shows this bullet by bullet comparison.  For more details on this comparison, e-mail us at dkline@qmation.com and request the full version of the ACP vs. Citrix White Paper.

To learn more follow this link or call us at 215-675-5800.

©2006 Q-mation, Inc. All rights reserved. All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.